Published date
10 Jul, 2023
Public procurement counts for 14% of the EU’s GDP. Businesses, especially SMEs, seek lower barriers to participation, governments need more efficiency, and citizens want the best services, works, and goods for their tax money. Access to procurement information is mission-critical for all of these aspirations. Yet public procurement data across the EU remains patchy and inaccessible. It is not yet possible to establish a coherent picture of what most governments are buying, when, from whom and for how much.
How Open is Public Procurement Data in the EU? Coalition’s new study
One of the most powerful moves the European Commission can make to address this problem is to mandate harmonised procurement data publication across the EU by including public procurement in the list of High-Value Datasets under the Open Data Directive. The European Parliament encouraged the Commission to do that in its recent Resolution on E-Government (para 35). This study looks at how much public procurement data, below the EU publication thresholds, was available across all EU countries in 2022 with the goal of informing policy considerations for amending the Open Data Directive.

It finds that:
– Data availability varies very widely with some countries like Luxembourg only publishing three fields of data in their national portal to others like Austria publishing 19 fields of data
– Some key fields for analysis and understanding of procurement like award values and contract implementation information are not routinely disclosed by Member States
– Just 60% of EU countries publish some procurement information as open data
– Less information is machine readable than is published on national portals.
For instance, in the case of Hungary, while it has 19 out of 21 fields in its system, the information is not available for download in open formats (CSV, JSON, XLM) and has to be scraped from the procurement portal, which limits access to users
– Only around 20% of countries publish some information about contract implementation, although still in very limited amounts
– Completeness of information varies widely. On average, data availability is over 85% for fields related to the tender title, buyer name, award dates, supplier names and CPV codes. In comparison, for countries that publish fields related to contract implementation, the average coverage is very low (4%), meaning this information is only available for a few procedures.
The Member States and the European Commission can improve the situation immediately:
– Countries should implement the new procurement eForms in their entirety (as much as possible) for harmonised data collection purposes and strengthen transparency regulations for spending data below the national and EU publication thresholds
– The European Commission should include public procurement in the list of High-Value Datasets under the Open Data Directive
– We provide a recommended list of data fields to be published in Table 2 (p. 8) that would significantly improve the quality, completeness and usability of European procurement information for policy goals such as encouraging entrepreneurship, SMEs and innovation.
Recommended data fields
“Mandatory” means mandatory in the eForms SDK. “Not mandatory” means included in eForms but not required.
| Stage | Data field | In eForms |
|---|---|---|
| Tender | Tender title | Mandatory |
| Tender | Tender description | Mandatory |
| Tender | Tender identifier | Mandatory |
| Tender | Buyer name | Not mandatory |
| Tender | Buyer id | Not mandatory |
| Tender | Tender procurement method | Mandatory |
| Tender | Tender status | Mandatory |
| Tender | CPV codes | Mandatory |
| Tender | Tender value amount | Not mandatory |
| Tender | Tender value currency | Not mandatory |
| Tender | Tender notice publication date | Mandatory |
| Tender | Tender end date | Mandatory |
| Tender | Number of bids | Not in eForms |
| Tender | Tenderer id | Not mandatory |
| Tender | Tenderer name | Not mandatory |
| Tender | EU co-financing | Not mandatory |
| Award | Award id | Not mandatory |
| Award | Award title | Not mandatory |
| Award | Award status | Mandatory |
| Award | Award date | Not mandatory |
| Award | Award value amount | Not mandatory |
| Award | Award value currency | Not mandatory |
| Award | Award supplier id | Not mandatory |
| Award | Award supplier name | Not mandatory |
| Contract | Contract id | Mandatory |
| Contract | Contract award id | Not mandatory |
| Contract | Contract status | Not in eForms |
| Contract | Recipient of the contract (name of the company or physical person) | Not mandatory |
| Contract | Contract title | Not mandatory |
| Contract | Contract start date | Not mandatory |
| Contract | Contract end date | Not mandatory |
| Contract | Contract date signed | Mandatory |
| Contract | Contract value amount | Not mandatory |
| Contract | Contract value currency | Not mandatory |
| Contract | Contract amendments | Mandatory |
| Contract | Contract implementation details (transactions, milestones and documents) | Not mandatory |
Availability of data fields by country
| Country | Fields published | Fields missing |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 19 | 2 |
| Hungary | 19 | 2 |
| Poland | 19 | 2 |
| Czech Republic | 18 | 3 |
| Finland | 18 | 3 |
| Bulgaria | 17 | 4 |
| Lithuania | 17 | 4 |
| Slovakia | 17 | 4 |
| The Netherlands | 17 | 4 |
| Croatia | 16 | 5 |
| France | 16 | 5 |
| Germany | 16 | 5 |
| Italy | 16 | 5 |
| Latvia | 16 | 5 |
| Portugal | 16 | 5 |
| Slovenia | 16 | 5 |
| Spain | 16 | 5 |
| Greece | 15 | 6 |
| Estonia | 14 | 7 |
| Romania | 14 | 7 |
| Belgium | 9 | 12 |
| Ireland | 9 | 12 |
| Republic of Cyprus | 9 | 12 |
| Malta | 8 | 13 |
| Sweden | 8 | 13 |
| Denmark | 6 | 15 |
| Luxembourg | 3 | 18 |
In other news
There are some new developments in the work on the anti-corruption directive. In February, the European Parliament’s LIB...
Learn moreWelcome to our review of our members’ activities. What did they since the beginning of 2024? You will find the answer be...
Learn moreThe European Commission published its Recovery and Resilience Facility Mid-term Evaluation Report on 21 February. Much e...
Learn more